These two arguments can not exist side-by-side in the logical mind. One of them must be incorrect. IMHO discrimination, intimidation, and the long history of it in the United States demands affirmative action. Had the original perpetrators of the horrors of Slavery made good on their conditions of surrender and supplied the famous "40 acres and a mule" the multiplication of penalties might not be due now. Yet the 150 years of, not just inaction, but out-right insurrection and repression of the People due this restitution in addition to the accumulated tremendous wealth of these same perpetrators demands justice in the form of affirmative action. And more.
Dear Mother, How we got here, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (26 October 1919 – 27 July 1980) was the Shah of Iran . In 1941, he succeeded his father Reza Shah and ruled the Imperial State of Iran until 1979 when the Iranian Revolution overthrew him. During World War II, the Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran forced the abdication of Reza Shah and succession of Mohammad Reza Shah. During his reign, the British-owned oil industry was nationalized by the prime minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, who had support from Iran's national parliament to do so; however, Mosaddegh was overthrown in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, which was carried out by the Iranian military under the aegis of the United Kingdom and the United States. Subsequently, the Iranian government centralized power under the Shah and brought foreign oil companies back into the country's industry through the Consortium Agreement of 1954. In 1963 , Mohammad Reza Shah introduced the White Revolution, a seri...
Comments